Eccentricity determination system and method for accurately computing an offset of a central feature of an object

ABSTRACT

An offset determination system and method permit accurate calculation of an offset of a central feature of an object. The offset determination system and method are particularly suited for, but not limited to, an automatic inspection system for determining the eccentricity of an optical fiber core relative to a theoretical ideal center of an optical fiber termination. The core is extremely smaller (typically between about 50 and 500 times) in size than the termination boundary. An inspection system has a feature imager, one or more boundary segment imagers but preferably four in number, and a machine vision system connected to the foregoing imagers. The feature imager is positioned to capture an image of the feature (e.g., fiber core endface), and the one or more boundary segment imagers are positioned to capture an image of a corresponding boundary segment of the object (e.g., termination endface). The machine vision system determines the offset, or eccentricity, based upon the feature image, the one or more boundary segment images, and the offset determination system and method.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is related to the following co-pending andcommonly assigned U.S. applications:

"Automatic Inspection Method For Contactlessly Measuring An Offset Of ACentral Feature Of An Object;" filed Aug. 2, 1995; accorded Ser. No.08/510,228;

"Automatic Inspection System For Contactlessly Measuring An Offset Of ACentral Feature Of An Object;" filed Aug. 2, 1995; accorded Ser. No.08/510,226

"Alignment And Lighting System And Method For Alignment And Lighting AnObject For An Inspection System That Contactlessly Measuring An OffsetOf A Central Feature Of The Object;" filed Aug. 2, 1995; accorded Ser.No. 08/510,205; and

"Balanced Focus System And Method For Achieving Optimal Focus OfDifferent Areas Of An Object That Are Concurrently Imaged;" filed Aug.2, 1995; accorded Ser. No. 08/510,221.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is related to the following co-pending andcommonly assigned U.S. applications:

"Automatic Inspection Method For Contactlessly Measuring An Offset Of ACentral Feature Of An Object;" filed Aug. 2, 1995; accorded Ser. No.08/510,228;

"Automatic Inspection System For Contactlessly Measuring An Offset Of ACentral Feature Of An Object;" filed Aug. 2, 1995; accorded Ser. No.08/510,226

"Alignment And Lighting System And Method For Alignment And Lighting AnObject For An Inspection System That Contactlessly Measuring An OffsetOf A Central Feature Of The Object;" filed Aug. 2, 1995; accorded Ser.No. 08/510,205; and

"Balanced Focus System And Method For Achieving Optimal Focus OfDifferent Areas Of An Object That Are Concurrently Imaged;" filed Aug.2, 1995; accorded Ser. No. 08/510,221.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to measurement, testing, andquality control systems, and more particularly, to an eccentricitydetermination system and method for accurately computing the degree ofoffset of a central feature of an object. The eccentricity determinationsystem and method are particularly suited for, but not limited to,computing the extent of offset, or eccentricity, of an optical fibercore relative to a theoretical ideal center of an alignment surface ofan optical fiber termination, where the core is extremely smaller insize than the alignment surface of the termination.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An optical fiber cable used for communications includes an opticalfiber. The optical fiber has a core that communicates light and claddingthat surrounds and protects the core. The cladding is in turn coveredwith one or more coating, insulating, shielding, and/or support layersto complete the cable. Considering that a typical optical fiber core maymeasure only about 8 to 50 microns in diameter, the connection of twooptical fiber cables so that their cores are precisely aligned is aformidable task.

In order to establish such a precise connection between optical fibersto be coupled, several different connection configurations have beendeveloped in the art. One known configuration for establishing aconnection between optical fibers is referred to as a ferruleconnection. An example of a ferrule connection is shown and described inboth U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,508 to Palmquist and U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,507 toPalmquist. Another known configuration is referred to as a biconicconnection. An example of a biconic connection is shown and described inU.S. Pat. No. 4,787,698 to Lyons et al.

In both of the aforementioned connection configurations, the ends of theoptical fiber cables to be joined are terminated, and the terminationsare provided with a surrounding support material, or plug. To enableoptimal performance and minimize light energy losses and reflections,the termination endfaces of the separate optical fiber terminationsshould be coupled so that the cores of the respective endfaces areprecisely aligned. To achieve this end, the termination endfaces arejoined by a coupling structure, which engages and aligns respectivealignment surfaces on the corresponding termination plugs. In the caseof a ferrule termination, the alignment surface is a generallycylindrical outermost boundary surface of the plug, which measures about2500 microns in diameter. Moreover, in the case of a biconictermination, the alignment surface is a bevelled chamfer with an endfacemeasuring about 4400 microns.

Successful assembly of a fiber termination for one of the aforementionedconnections requires that the endface of the core be disposed very closeto the center of the termination endface. The core endface (about 8 to50 microns in diameter) is much smaller in diameter than the terminationalignment surface (about 2500 microns in the case of a ferruletermination and about 4400 microns in the case of a biconictermination). Moreover, the offset, or eccentricity, of the corerelative to the alignment surface should not exceed a micron on each ofthe two mating terminations. To achieve the foregoing precision, it isdesirable to measure the eccentricity within a precision of about 0.1micron. Several known prior art methods for measuring the eccentricityare described hereafter.

A first method involves digitizing points on the boundary of the coreendface and of the termination endface by moving the termination endfacerelative to a toolmaker's microscope with the termination axis disposedparallel to the viewing axis of the toolmaker's microscope. Mathematicalequations are then fitted to the digitized points in order to determinethe centers of the core and termination. The distance between these twocenter points is defined as the eccentricity.

A second method of measuring the eccentricity involves viewing the coreunder a high power microscope, while the termination is rotated in afixture, such as a V-shaped support block. The movement of the core ismeasured as the termination is rotated about its longitudinal axis. Thelocus of points defining the center of the core is, in general, circularas the termination is rotated, and the radius of the circle is equal tothe eccentricity. The aforementioned technique is described in moredetail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,787,698 to Lyons et al., relative to a biconicconnection, and in U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,508 to Palmquist, relative to aferrule connection.

A third method of measuring the eccentricity focuses upon measuring theeffect of eccentricity and involves interconnecting the terminationunder test to a reference connector, sometimes referred to as a "goldenconnector," that is known to have negligible eccentricity. Afterestablishing the connection with a coupling structure, the lighttransmission therethrough is measured. The eccentricity is determinedbased upon the loss of light and one or more mathematical equations thatdefine the light loss as a function of the eccentricity.

A fourth method, which is basically obvious but has not beendemonstrated successfully to date for reasons set forth hereafter,involves obtaining an image of the entire termination endface andfitting points to the boundaries of the core and termination. Aftergenerating the foregoing image, the offset can then be directly computedusing known mathematical techniques. For instance, the offset can bedetermined by first fitting circles to the boundary pixels and corepixels, respectively, then determining the circle centers, and finally,the offset can be calculated as the displacement between the circlecenters.

However, at present, the foregoing method cannot be practicallyimplemented because of the extreme disparity in size between the coreendface (about 8 microns in diameter) and the termination endface (2500microns in diameter). Unfortunately, conventional machine vision systemshave a standard resolution of typically 512×512 picture elements(pixels) and thus would have inadequate resolution to precisely locatethe core with the desired resolution. More specifically, with thetermination endface measuring 2500 microns in diameter, each pixel wouldrepresent about 5 microns. The core, with a diameter of for instanceabout 8 microns, would span only 1 to 2 pixels, and consequently, theprocess of locating the core to the requisite precision of 0.1 micronwould be impossible. Locating the termination to a precision of 0.1micron would require a subpixel resolution of about 1/50th of a pixel,which is generally not considered to be a routinely achievable practicein the machine vision art. Moreover, if an image of the terminationendface is magnified to the extent that the core represents an adequatenumber of pixels, the termination boundary would no longer be present inthe image and its position cannot be ascertained with accuracy.Furthermore, to further complicate imaging, the termination boundary andcore boundary are not generally coplanar.

Hence, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the industry for a systemof contactlessly measuring the eccentricity of an optical fibertermination that is accurate within at least 0.1 micron, is less laborintensive, less material intensive, and less expensive than presentlyknown systems. More particularly, a system is needed for contactlesslymeasuring the eccentricity of an optical fiber termination to aprecision of at least 0.1 micron without the requirement of moving thetermination on a coordinate measuring system such as a toolmaker'smicroscope, without the requirement of rotating the termination aboutits longitudinal axis to observe relative core movement, and without therequirement of connecting the termination to a transmission measurementtest set in order to measure the light loss caused by misalignment.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides for an eccentricity determination systemand method for accurately computing the degree of offset of a centralfeature of an object. The eccentricity determination system and methodare particularly suited for, but not limited to, computing the extent ofoffset, or eccentricity, of an optical fiber core relative to atheoretical ideal center of an alignment surface of an optical fibertermination, where the core is extremely smaller in size than thealignment surface of the termination. In this context, it should benoted that the core is extremely smaller (typically between about 50 and300 times for a ferrule termination and about 80 and 550 times for abiconic termination) in size than the alignment surface of thetermination.

The inspection system generally comprises (a) an imaging system with afeature imager and one or more boundary segment imagers but preferablyfour in number and (b) a machine vision system connected to theforegoing imagers of the imaging system. The feature imager ispositioned to capture an image (feature image) of the feature (e.g.,fiber core), and the one or more boundary segment imagers are positionedto capture an image of a boundary segment of the object (e.g., atermination endface). In the case where the object is a termination, thefeature is the core and the boundary segment is the endface boundary ofthe alignment surface, which is a generally cylindrical outermostboundary surface of the plug in the case of a ferrule termination andwhich is a bevelled chamfer in the case of a biconic termination.Finally, the machine vision system determines the offset (e.g.,eccentricity in the case of a termination endface) based upon thefeature image and the one or more boundary segment images.

Preferably, the feature imager and each boundary segment imager comprisea respective lens. Each boundary segment lens is situated in a firstplane and the feature lens is situated in a second plane that issubstantially parallel to the first plane. Moreover, the first andsecond planes are separated by a distance that corresponds to alongitudinal spacing between the feature and the boundary of the object.Furthermore, a camera, for example, a charge couple device (CCD), issituated adjacent the lenses to simultaneously receive a multiplicity ofimages that are produced from the feature and boundary segment lenses,to thereby form a combined image. Finally, in the preferred embodiment,an objective lens and a collector lens are disposed on either side ofthe imager lenses so that each of the boundary segment lenses invertsand folds inwardly its respective boundary segment, while the featurelens passes its image in an noninverted state to the camera.

The machine vision system of the inspection system employs and is drivenby an inspection method, which computes the degree of offset of thefeature of the object under test from the theoretical ideal centerC_(ideal) of the object. The inspection method can be broadly summarizedas follows. The termination endface is exposed to the boundary segmentimager(s) and the feature imager of the imaging system. The boundarysegment imager(s) produces a boundary segment image that isrepresentative of a boundary segment of the alignment surface. Moreover,the feature imager generates a feature image that is representative ofthe feature of interest. In the preferred embodiment, the images arecombined into a single combined image, and an electrical signalindicative of the combined image is passed onto the machine visionsystem for analysis. Alternatively, each of the imagers may generate aseparate electrical signal representative of its respective area ofinterest, and the separate electrical signals are passed onto themachine vision system, where the electrical signals are used toconstruct the combined image in software or firmware for analysis.

From the combined image, the machine vision system determines theoffset, or eccentricity, of the feature relative to the alignmentsurface as follows. A curve (e.g., a circle of known diameter) is fittedto each boundary segment captured by each boundary segment imager 36. Atermination endface center T_(test) is mathematically identified basedupon the one or more fitted curves. Generally, the more curves that areutilized, the more accurate will be the determination of the theoreticaltermination endface center T_(test). In the preferred embodiment, thereare four boundary segment imagers and as a result, there are fourcircles fitted to the alignment surface. Moreover, the actual coreendface center C_(test) of the object under test is determined using anyappropriate analysis of the combined image, for example but not limitedto, gradient analysis.

The eccentricity is determined using one of two embodiments (firstembodiment of calibration and eccentricity determination of FIGS. 11-13;second embodiment of calibration and eccentricity determination of FIGS.14-16) that are described in detail later in this document. In the firstembodiment, an eccentricity vector e is determined by comparing adistance vector d_(test) (vectors are indicated in bold herein; d_(test)has a magnitude and a direction) with a distance vector d_(ideal). Thedistance vector d_(test) represents the displacement between the coreendface center C_(test) and the termination endface center T_(test),both corresponding with a test termination. The distance vectord_(ideal) represents the displacement between an ideal core endfacecenter C_(ideal) and an ideal termination endface center T_(ideal), bothcorresponding with an ideal termination (i.e., characterized by deminimis eccentricity) and stored during intialization of the inspectionsystem. The magnitude of the eccentricity vector e is the desiredeccentricity value, and the angle of the eccentricity vector e reflectsthe angle of the eccentricity.

In the second embodiment (best mode), the eccentricity is determinedfirst by drawing radial lines outwardly from the core endface centerC_(test) and positioning each fitted circle center on a respectiveradial line. Further, the intercept points where the radial linesintersect the fitted circles are identified and compared to idealintercept points corresponding to an ideal termination endface centerT_(ideal). A transformation map (lookup table or equation) having theideal intercept points is generated during initialization of theinspection system, and the ideal intercept points are retrieved inoperation based upon the core endface center C_(test). Finally, theeccentricity is determined by comparing the ideal intercept points withthe actual intercept points.

The novel offset determination system and method of the presentinvention have many advantages, a few examples of which are set forthhereafter.

An advantage of the offset determination system and method is that theyprovide for measurement of an offset of a central feature of the objectwith a very high accuracy of typically less than 0.1 micron.

Another advantage of the offset determination system and method is thatan offset of a central feature of an object can be measured withsubmicron accuracy by analyzing only a single combined image that hasimage components generated by separate optical elements.

Another advantage of the offset determination system and method is thatthey provide for simplified testing of the eccentricity of an opticalfiber core at a termination (e.g., ferrule type or biconic type), ascompared to the prior art.

Another advantage of the offset determination system and method is thatthey provide for accurate calculation of the eccentricity of an opticalfiber core at a termination without the requirement of rotation ortranslation of the object during the measurement, as undesirablypracticed in the prior art.

Another advantage of the offset determination system and method is thatthey provide for accurate calculation of the eccentricity of an opticalfiber core at a termination without the requirement of moving thetermination on a coordinate measuring system, such as a toolmaker'smicroscope, as undesirably practiced in the prior art.

Another advantage of the offset determination system and method is thatthey provide for accurate calculation of the eccentricity of an opticalfiber core at a termination without the requirement of rotating thetermination about its longitudinal axis to observe relative coremovement, as undesirably practiced in the prior art.

Another advantage of the offset determination system and method is thatthey provide for accurate calculation of the eccentricity of an opticalfiber core at a termination without the requirement of connecting thetermination to a transmission measurement test set in order to measurethe light loss caused by misalignment, as undesirably practiced in theprior art.

Other features and advantages of the present invention will becomeapparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the followingdrawings and detailed description. It is intended that all suchadditional features and advantages be included herein within the scopeof the present invention, as is defined by the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention can be better understood with reference to thefollowing drawings. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasisinstead being placed upon clearly illustrating principles of the presentinvention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designatecorresponding parts throughout the several views.

FIG. 1A is a perspective view of a conventional ferrule type opticalfiber termination, as an example of an object to be analyzed inaccordance with the present invention;

FIG. 1B is an endface view of the termination of FIG. 1A;

FIG. 1C is a cross sectional view of an optical fiber that is within thetermination of FIG. 1A, showing a central optical fiber core andsurrounding cladding;

FIG. 1D is a cross sectional view of a coupling structure for connectingseparate ferrule terminations of FIG. 1A and 1B;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the inspection system of thepresent invention;

FIG. 3A is a block diagram illustrating a first embodiment of theinspection system of FIG. 2;

FIG. 3B is a block diagram of a best mode for practicing the firstembodiment of FIG. 3A;

FIG. 3C is a front view of a novel lens configuration employed in thebest mode embodiment of FIG. 3B taken along line 3C'--3C';

FIG. 4A is a block diagram illustrating a second embodiment of theinspection system of FIG. 2;

FIG. 4B is a block diagram illustrating placement of boundary segmentimagers in the second embodiment of the inspection system of FIG. 4A;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a third embodiment of theinspection system of FIG. 2;

FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating a fourth embodiment of theinspection system of FIG. 2;

FIG. 7A is a front view of an alignment apparatus for aligning a ferruleoptical fiber termination to be analyzed by the inspection system ofFIG. 2;

FIG. 7B is a cross-sectional view of the alignment apparatus of FIG. 7Ataken along line 7B'--7B';

FIG. 7C is a rear perspective view of the alignment apparatus of FIG.7A;

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating the termination endface andthe various separate regions that are imaged by the inspection system ofFIG. 2;

FIGS. 9A through 9D are schematic diagrams of combined images (andperhaps display images) that can be formed and analyzed by theinspection system of FIG. 2; particularly, FIG. 9A shows a combinedimage derived from a core image and an inverted boundary segment image;FIG. 9B shows a combined image derived from a core image and anoninverted boundary segment image; FIG. 9C shows a combined image (bestmode) derived from a core image and four inverted boundaryequally-spaced segment images; and FIG. 9D shows a combined imagederived from a core image and four noninverted equally-spaced boundarysegment images;

FIGS. 10A and 10B show a flow chart illustrating an inspection method ofthe present invention that is employed by and drives the machine visionsystem in the inspection system of FIG. 2;

FIGS. 11 and 12 show a first embodiment for calibration and eccentricitydetermination in the inspection method of FIGS. 10A and 10B;specifically, FIG. 11 shows a calibration method, and FIG. 12 shows acorresponding offset determination method;

FIG. 13 shows a graph that illustrates the first embodiment forcalibration and eccentricity determination of FIGS. 11 and 12;

FIGS. 14 and 15 show a second embodiment (best mode) for calibration andeccentricity determination in the inspection method of FIGS. 10A and10B; specifically, FIG. 14 shows a calibration method, and FIG. 15 showsa corresponding offset determination method;

FIG. 16 is a schematic view of the combined image (best mode) of FIG. 9Cshowing how a theoretical ideal center C_(ideal) of an ideal terminationis used to create a transformation map and how an eccentricity isdetermined from the core endface center C_(test) of a test terminationbased upon the transformation map, in accordance with the secondembodiment for calibration and eccentricity determination of FIGS. 14and 15;

FIGS. 17A through 17C show a flow chart illustrating a balanced focusmethod that optionally can be utilized in conjunction with theinspection method of FIGS. 10A and 10B for optimizing the eccentricitycomputation; and

FIG. 18 is a graph showing a statistic S that is utilized in thebalanced focus method of FIGS. 17A and 17B.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Although not limited to this particular application, the inspectionsystem of the present invention are particularly suited forcontactlessly and nondestructively measuring at an endface of an opticalfiber termination the extent of offset, or eccentricity, of an opticalfiber core relative to a center of the termination. In this application,the optical fiber core is extremely smaller (typically between about 50and 300 times) in size than the outermost termination boundary. For thesake of clarity, an optical fiber termination for a ferrule connectionis illustrated in the views of FIGS. 1A and 1B, and the inspectionsystem will be described in the context of imaging the aforementionedspecific type of termination. Note that the biconic termination that isdescribed hereafter is disclosed in more detail in U.S. Pat. No.4,738,508 to Palmquist and U.S. Pat. No. 4,738,507 to Palmquist. Furthernote that the inspection system may be used for determining theeccentricity of other types of terminations, including particularly thetermination used in a biconic connection, as described in U.S. Pat. No.4,787,698 to Lyons et al.

I. OPTICAL FIBER TERMINATION AND MEASUREMENT OF ECCENTRICITY

FIG. 1A illustrates a ferrule termination 21. The ferrule termination 21includes a generally-cylindrical outer support layer, or plug, 22surrounding a generally cylindrical internal optical fiber 24. Anendface 21' of the termination 21 includes a plug endface 22' situatedabout an optical fiber endface 24'. The endfaces 22', 24' collectivelyform a generally continuous spherical curvature (typically a radius ofabout 18 mm) that is transverse to the longitudinal z axis of the fiber24. The termination endface 21' further comprises a beveled chamfer 22"situated between the plug endface 22' and a cylindrical outermost plugboundary surface 22"', which will be referred to as an alignment surfacebecause it is engaged and guided by a coupling structure in a connectionto insure alignment of separate terminations 21. The beveled chamfer 22"is generally conically annular about and symmetric with respect to theelongated optical fiber 24. Further, the alignment surface 22"' measurestypically about 2500 microns in the ferrule termination 21 of thepreferred embodiment.

The optical fiber 24 includes an outer elongated cladding layer 27 andan internal elongated cylindrical core 28 having a core endface 28', asillustrated in FIGS. 1B and 1C. The core generally measuresapproximately between 8 and 50 microns. Hence, the core is much smaller(typically between about 50 and 300 times for a ferrule termination andabout 80 and 550 times for a biconic termination) than the alignmentsurface 22"' of the plug 22.

In a connection of two separate terminations 21, to enable optimalperformance and minimize light energy losses and reflections, thetermination endfaces 21' of the separate terminations 21 should becoupled so that the cores endfaces 28' of the respective endfaces 21'are precisely aligned. To achieve this end, the termination endfaces 21'are joined by a coupling structure 26, shown in cross section in FIG.1D, which engages and aligns respective alignment surfaces 22"' on thecorresponding termination plugs. Usually, the coupling structure 26comprises a generally cylindrical sleeve 29 or equivalent thereof. Anexample of a coupling structure 26 having the sleeve 29 is described inU.S. Pat. No. 4,738,508 to Palmquist. In the case of a ferruletermination, the termination has an outer alignment surface 22"' ofabout 2500 microns in diameter that is aligned and guided by thecoupling structure 26.

In order to further insure proper alignment of the core endfaces 28' ofterminations 21 in an optical fiber termination connection, the coreendface 28' of each termination 21 should be disposed very close to thecenter of the termination endface 21'. The eccentricity of a terminationis generally a measurement of the deviation of the core endface 28' fromthe center of the termination alignment surface. The concept ofeccentricity is more fully described hereafter in relation to FIG. 1B.For purposes of clarity and understanding, the eccentricity associatedwith the termination 21 is visually exaggerated. Herein, theeccentricity is defined as the deviation or displacement of the coreendface 28' corresponding to the test termination 21 and having centerC_(test) from the theoretical ideal center C_(ideal) of the endface areadefined by the alignment surface 22"'. As described previously, theeccentricity of the core endface 28' relative to the alignment surface22"' should not exceed a micron on each of two mating terminations 21 inorder to achieve optimal performance. To achieve the foregoingprecision, it is desirable to measure the eccentricity within aprecision of about 0.1 micron.

It should be noted that the determination of eccentricity in the ferruletermination is slightly different than the determination of eccentricityin the biconic termination. More specifically, in a biconic termination,the alignment surface is the bevelled chamfer itself, which is a muchlarger region than the bevelled chamfer in the ferrule termination, andthe boundary of interest for determining eccentricity is the boundarywhere the plug endface meets the bevelled chamfer. Moreover, thediameter of the foregoing boundary is typically about 4400 microns.

II. AUTOMATIC INSPECTION SYSTEM

A. Architecture

An automatic inspection system 30 in accordance with the presentinvention is illustrated by way of a block diagram in FIG. 2. Theautomatic inspection system 30 can be used to accurately determine anoffset of a feature (e.g., fiber core) of an object (e.g., optical fibertermination) from the theoretical ideal center C_(ideal) of the objectwithout destruction of or contact with the object. It should be notedthat the discussion hereafter relative to the inspection system 30 isalso applicable to the specific implementations (i.e., inspectionsystems 30a, 30a', 30b, 30c, 30d) of the system 30 that are describedlater in this document.

In architecture, the inspection system 30 has an imaging system 32. Theimaging system 32 has one or more boundary segment imagers 36(preferably four spaced equidistant around the alignment surface 22"';only one is shown in FIG. 2 and in the specific implementations merelyfor simplicity) and a feature imager 38. Each boundary segment imager 36is configured to capture an image of a respective boundary segment ofthe alignment surface 22"', as indicated by phantom lines in FIG. 2.Moreover, the feature imager 38 is configured to capture an image of thefeature at issue, which may exhibit an offset from the alignment surface22"'. The imagers 36, 38 can be any suitable apparatus, conventional orcustom made, for receiving an optical image as described and convertingthe optical image into an electrical signal for processing. Further, theimagers 36, 38 may share hardware, as will be further clear after thediscussion of the specific implementations.

When the inspection system 30 is utilized to image a ferrule terminationendface 21', it is desirable to recess (by approximately 0.5 mm) thefeature imager 38 slightly behind the boundary segment imager 36 fromthe termination endface 21' so as to accommodate for the difference infocal plane between the feature (termination core) and the boundarysegment(s) on the termination endface 21'. This configuration enablesoptimal focusing of the termination endface 21' and more accuratedetermination of the eccentricity.

A machine vision system 34 is interconnected with the optical system 32for processing the aforementioned image information. The machine visionsystem 34 can be any suitable logic, processor, or computer that isconventional or custom made and that is configured to process theelectrical signals 42, 44 from the respective imagers 36, 38. In thepreferred embodiment, the machine vision system 34 executes and isdriven by an inspection method 140 (FIGS. 10A-10B), preferably in theform of an executable software program.

The imaging system 32 is interconnected with and is selectively moved byan automatic focus adjustment mechanism (FAM) 39, which in turn iscontrolled by the machine vision system 34 as indicated by referencearrow 41. The FAM 39 is interfaced with the optical system 32 so thatthe imagers 36, 38 can be moved, individually or collectively, to orfrom the respective areas to be imaged on the termination endface 21' soas to focus in the respective areas for precise imaging and for preciseanalysis by the machine vision system 34.

Optionally, an output device 46 may be employed and connected to themachine vision system 34, as is indicated by the reference arrow 47. Theoutput device 46 can be any suitable mechanism for supplying informationto the user. For example, the output device 46 can be a conventionaldisplay or printer. Aside from receiving diagnostic and operationalparameters and perhaps an initiation signal from the user, theinspection system 30 as well as the specific implementations thereof arefully automatic. In fact, the inspection systems as described herein canbe set up to completely automatically communicate to another automatedsystem.

An input device 48, which is also optional, can be any suitablemechanism for receiving prompts or information from the user andconveying the information to the machine vision system 34, as indicatedby the reference arrow 49. As examples, the input device 48 can be aconventional computer keyboard, mouse, trackball, etc.

Depending upon the lighting conditions around the object under test, theobject may need to be affirmatively illuminated with a light source. Inthe preferred embodiments, the optical fiber termination 21 isilluminated with any suitable light source so that images can becaptured by the imagers 36, 38. Several lighting embodiments (e.g., FIG.7B) will be described hereinafter.

The inspection system 30 may be mounted in a commercial scale opticalfiber manufacturing facility or other facility for monitoring thequality control of optical fiber terminations 21. Moreover, thetermination 21 under test can be disposed in view of the imaging system32 by manual human manipulation or, alternatively, by an automatedmechanism. As an example, the termination 21 could be situated upon aconveyor, along with perhaps many other terminations 21 situated inseries, and moved in front of the imaging system 32 so that ameasurement can be automatically made by the inspection system 30.

B. Operation

When the inspection system 30 is in operation, the termination endface21' is exposed to the boundary segment imager(s) 36 and the featureimager 38 of the imaging system 32. The boundary segment imager(s) 36produces a boundary segment image that is representative of a boundarysegment of the alignment surface 22"'. Moreover, the feature imager 38generates a feature image that is representative of the feature ofinterest. As indicated by reference numerals 42, 44, 45 in FIG. 2, inthe preferred embodiment, the images are combined into a single combinedimage, and an electrical signal indicative of the combined image ispassed onto the machine vision system 34 for analysis. Alternatively,each of the imagers 36, 38 may generate a separate electrical signalrepresentative of its respective area of interest, and the separateelectrical signals are passed onto the machine vision system 34, wherethe electrical signals are used to construct the combined image insoftware or firmware for analysis.

From the combined image, the machine vision system 34 determines theoffset, or eccentricity, of the feature relative to the alignmentsurface 22"' as follows. A curve (e.g., a circle of known diameter) isfitted to each boundary segment captured by each boundary segment imager36. A termination endface center T_(test) is mathematically identifiedbased upon the one or more fitted curves. Generally, the more curvesthat are utilized, the more accurate will be the determination of thetheoretical termination endface center T_(test). In the preferredembodiment, there are four boundary segment imagers 36 and as a result,there are four circles fitted to the alignment surface 22"'. Moreover,the actual core endface center C_(test) of the object under test isdetermined using any appropriate analysis of the combined image, forexample but not limited to, gradient analysis.

The eccentricity is determined using one of two embodiments (firstembodiment of calibration and eccentricity determination of FIGS. 11-13;second embodiment of calibration and eccentricity determination of FIGS.14-16) that are described in detail later in this document. In the firstembodiment, an eccentricity vector e is determined by comparing adistance vector d_(test) with a distance vector d_(ideal). The distancevector d_(test) represents the displacement between the core endfacecenter C_(test) and the termination endface center T_(test), bothcorresponding with a test termination 21. The distance vector d_(ideal)represents the displacement between an ideal core endface centerC_(ideal) and an ideal termination endface center T_(ideal), bothcorresponding with an ideal termination 21 (i.e., characterized by deminimis eccentricity) and stored during initialization of the system 30.Further, a magnitude and angle for the eccentricity can be directlydetermined from the eccentricity vector e.

In the second embodiment (best mode), the eccentricity is determinedfirst by drawing radial lines outwardly from the core endface centerC_(test) and positioning each fitted circle center on a respectiveradial line. Further, the intercept points where the radial linesintersect the fitted circles are identified and compared to idealintercept points corresponding to an ideal termination endface centerT_(ideal). A transformation map (lookup table or equation) having theideal intercept.points is generated during initialization of theinspection system 30, and the ideal intercept points are retrieved inoperation based upon the core endface center C_(test). Finally, theeccentricity is determined by comparing the ideal intercept points withthe actual intercept points.

C. First Embodiment Of The Inspection System

A first embodiment of the inspection system 30 is illustrated in FIG. 3Aand is generally denoted by reference numeral 30a. Structurally, theinspection system 30a comprises an imaging system 32 having anelongated, preferably cylindrical, microscope 51, which is shown incross section in FIG. 3A situated along a longitudinal z axis that isgenerally in line with the termination 21 (perpendicular to thetermination endface 21').

The microscope 51 includes an objective 52 (one or more lenses or otheroptical elements) situated at a first end of the microscope 51 andadapted to capture images of the termination endface 21'. The microscope51 further comprises an arrangement 54 of secondary lenses situated nearthe longitudinal midpoint of the microscope 51. The secondary lensarrangement 54 includes a boundary segment lens 56 situated near aninternal periphery of the microscope 51 and a centrally-situated featurelens 58, which is disposed along the longitudinal axis of the microscope51. The microscope 51 further includes a collector 62 (one or morelenses or other optical elements) positioned at a second end of themicroscope 51 to receive images from the secondary lens arrangement 54and to project a combined image through an opening 63 at the second endof the microscope 51. A "combined image" herein means a single imagederived from the superimposition or combination of two or more otherimages via hardware, software, or combination thereof. The objective 52,the feature lens 58, and the collector 62 have their focal pointspositioned and substantially aligned along a common z axis, while theboundary segment lens 56 has its focal point positioned along another zaxis that is parallel to the common z axis.

Because of the aforementioned lens arrangement in the microscope 51, theboundary segment appears inverted in the combined image, while thefeature appears noninverted. In other words, the boundary segment imagethat is retrieved from the objective 52 is effectively folded inwardlytoward the feature when the combined image is formed at the collector62. Moreover, the feature image is received by the centrally-situatedfeature lens 58 from the objective 52 and passed in a noninverted stateto the collector 62, so that the feature appears noninverted in theultimate combined image.

A camera 64 is connected to the second end of the microscope 51 and ispositioned to receive the combined image from the collector 62 throughthe opening 63. The camera 64 can be any suitable imaging device forconverting an optical image into an electrical signal, but is preferablya charge-couple device (CCD). The CCD camera 64 comprises a pixel arrayfor receiving light. Moreover, the pixel array encodes the image bygenerating analog voltage signals proportional to the intensity of lightat each pixel of the CCD, as is well known in the art.

The machine vision system 34 receives the analog electrical signals thatencode the combined image from the CCD camera 64, as is indicated by thereference arrow 45. As mentioned, the machine vision system can beimplemented with any suitable logic, processor, computer, or acombination thereof.

The microscope 51 is mounted to the FAM 39. Under the control of themachine vision system 34 as indicated by reference arrow 41, the FAM 39can move the microscope 51 along its longitudinal z axis so that thelens configuration within the microscope 51 is moved to or from thetermination endface 21'. A suitable FAM 39 is a piezoelectric translatorthat can selectively move the microscope 51 a distance based upon aclosed loop control signal of voltage.

1. Best Mode Embodiment Of The Invention

FIG. 3B illustrates the best mode embodiment for practicing the presentinvention and, particularly, the best mode embodiment for practicing thefirst embodiment (the inspection system 30a of FIG. 3A). The best modeembodiment is generally denoted by reference numeral 30a' in FIG. 3B.

In structure, the inspection system 30a' is constructed in generally thesame manner as the inspection system 30a (FIG. 3A), with the exceptionof the secondary lens arrangement 54. Thus, the previous discussionrelative to the system 30a, to the extent applicable, is incorporatedherein by reference and directed to the system 30a' of FIG. 3B.

With respect to the secondary lens arrangement 54 of the best modeembodiment of FIG. 3B, the arrangement 54 has four boundary segmentlenses 56a-56d in a satellite configuration situated substantiallyequidistant around the centrally-situated feature lens 58 and along theinternal periphery of the microscope 51. FIG. 3C is a front view of anovel lens configuration employed in the best mode embodiment of FIG. 3Btaken along line 3C'--3C' of FIG. 3B. From FIG. 3C, it is apparent thatthe boundary segment lenses 56a-56d are spaced about 90 degrees apartabout the central feature lens 58. Hence, in the best mode, fourboundary segment imagers and a feature imager are implemented.

Furthermore, because the inspection system 30 is utilized to image aferrule termination endface 21', it is desirable to recess (byapproximately 0.5 mm) the feature lens 58 slightly behind the plane ofthe boundary segment lenses 56a-56d from the termination endface 21' soas to accommodate for the difference in focal plane between thetermination core endface 28' and the alignment surface 22"' on thetermination endface 21'. This configuration enables optimal focusing ofthe termination endface 21' and more accurate determination of theeccentricity.

In the best mode embodiment of FIG. 3B, the objective 52 and thesecondary lenses 56a-56d, 58, and the collector 62 have an effectivemagnification of 30x. The camera 64 is a CCD, such as a model KP-M1,which is commercially available from Hitachi, Japan.

The FAM 39 is a model P721.00 piezoelectric translator, which ismanufactured by Physik Instrumente, Germany. The foregoing piezoelectrictranslator can selectively move the microscope 51 a distance of about100 microns (with a resolution of 3 about nanometers) based upon aclosed loop control signal of voltage between about 0 and 100 volts.When 0 volts is supplied to the piezoelectric translator 72, theobjective 52 is maintained at its greatest distance (is completelyretracted) from its target along the z axis, whereas when 100 volts issupplied to the piezoelectric translator 72, the objective 52 is theclosest distance (full extension) to the target along the z axis.

The machine vision system 34 includes a general purpose computer 71,such as a model Globalyst 600 computer, which is commercially availablefrom AT&T, U.S.A. The computer 71 is equipped with a machine visionprocessor 72, for example but not limited to, a model ITI ITEX OFG(overlay frame grabber) image processing card that is commerciallyavailable from Microdisk, Inc., U.S.A. The computer 71 and processor 72communicate, as is indicated by reference arrow 73 in FIG. 3B. Themachine vision system 34 further includes an amplifier 75 that isconnected between the control line(s) of the computer and the FAM 39.The amplifier 75 receives control signals, as delineated by referencearrow 74, from the machine vision system 34, amplifies them, andprovides amplified piezocontrol signals 41 within the voltage range of0-100 volts to the piezoelectric FAM 39, as indicated by the referencearrow 41. A suitable amplifier is a model E860.10 amplifier manufacturedby and commercially available from Physik Instrumente, Germany.

D. Second Embodiment Of The Inspection System

A second embodiment of the automatic inspection system 30 of FIG. 2 isillustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B, and is generally denoted by referencenumeral 30b. The automatic inspection system 30b comprises a featureimager 38 and at least three boundary segment imagers 36, only one ofwhich is shown in FIG. 4A for simplicity. The feature imager 38 and theboundary segment imagers 36 are mutually exclusive elements in hardware.The feature imager 38 is disposed over the core endface 28' (see FIG.1B) and at a vantage point in line with the longitudinal z axis of thetermination 21, while the boundary segment imagers 36 are disposed toview the alignment surface 22"' at an angle that is transverse andpreferably perpendicular to the longitudinal z axis of the termination21.

At least three boundary segment imagers 36 are needed for curve fittingpurposes, as will be further described hereafter. Further, the boundarysegment imagers 36 are preferably spaced symmetrically about thelongitudinal z axis of the termination 21. Thus, in the case where thereare three boundary segment imagers 36, as shown in FIG. 4B, adjacentboundary segment imagers 36 are spaced apart by an angle θ equal toabout 120 degrees.

The feature imager 38 has an objective 81 suspended in a microscope tube82 and positioned to be exposed to the termination endface 21' of thetermination 21. The objective 81 can be any suitable lens configuration,but is preferably a single lens with a magnification of 40x and NA of0.6. A FAM 39a is connected to the microscope tube 82 for moving thetube 82 and lens 81 along an z axis aligned with the longitudinal axisof the termination 21 under the control of the machine vision system 34as indicated by arrows 41, 41a. The FAM 39a can be a piezoelectrictranslator, for example but not limited to, a model P721.00piezoelectric translator manufactured by Physik Instrumente, Germany. Amicroscope 86 (including one or more lenses or other optical elements)is connected to the FAM 39a for receiving an image from the objective81. The microscope 86 can be a model ME-3000, manufactured by MicroEnterprises, Inc., U.S.A. A camera 88 is mounted to the microscope 86and is configured to receive an optical image from the microscope 86 andconvert the optical image into an electrical signal. The camera 88 isany suitable CCD, such as a model KP-M1, which is commercially availablefrom Hitachi, Japan.

Each boundary segment imager 36 is constructed as follows. Each boundarysegment imager 36 has an objective 81 suspended in a microscope tube 82and positioned to be exposed to the termination endface 21' of thetermination 21. The objective 81 can be any suitable lens configuration,but is preferably a single lens with a magnification of 20x and NA of0.4. A FAM 39b is connected to the microscope tube 82 for moving thetube 82 and lens 81 perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of thetermination 21 under the control of the machine vision system 34 asindicated by arrows 41, 41b. The FAM 39b can be a piezoelectrictranslator, for example but not limited to, a model P721.00piezoelectric translator manufactured by Physik Instrumente, Germany.

An interferometric microscope 87 is connected to the FAM 39b forreceiving an image from the objective 81. A suitable interferometricmicroscope 87 is the model ME-3000c, which is manufactured by andcommercially available from Micro Enterprises, Inc. U.S.A. Theinterferometric microscope 87 has an internal light source and aninternal light reflection apparatus. It is known in the art that theinterferometric microscope 87 can be used to measure very smalldistances and thicknesses using known wavelengths of light. Generally,in the interferometric microscope 87, a beam of light from the lightsource is separated into two opposing beam parts by partial reflectionsat the reflection apparatus. One beam part is projected against thetarget, returns to the interferometric microscope, and is reunited withthe other beam part at the reflection apparatus. Because the beams havetraversed different optical paths, the two components produceinterference in the image of the target. Furthermore, the interferencecan be utilized to measure very small distances or thicknesses.

A camera 88 is mounted to the interferometric microscope 87 and isconfigured to receive an optical image (the combined image from thereflection apparatus) from the microscope 86 and convert the opticalimage into an electrical signal. The camera 88 is any suitable CCD, suchas a model KP-M1, which is commercially available from Hitachi, Japan.

The machine vision system 34 is implemented with any suitable logic,processor, computer, or combination thereof, as previously describedwith reference to the first embodiment and best mode embodiment. Themachine vision system 34 is configured to construct a combined imagefrom the electrical signals provided by the cameras 64 of the threeboundary segment imagers 36 and feature imager 38. The combined imageincludes the boundary segment(s) captured by the boundary segmentimagers 36 and the feature captured by the feature imager 38. From thisimage, the eccentricity can be computed, as previously described. Notethat in this embodiment that the boundary segment imagers 36 provideabsolute distances. Moreover, boundary pixels are identified from theabsolute distances measured by the boundary segment imagers 36, and acircle or other appropriate curve is fitted to the boundary pixels inorder to determine T_(ideal), T_(test).

E. Third Embodiment Of The Inspection System

A third embodiment of the automatic inspection system 30 of FIG. 2 isillustrated in FIG. 5 and generally denoted by reference numeral 30c.

In the automatic inspection system 30c, each of the one or more boundarysegment imagers 36 comprises a prism 91 positioned to capture a boundarysegment image, an objective 92 mounted in relationship to the prism 91to receive the boundary segment image, and a camera 64 for receiving theboundary segment image from the objective 92. In the preferredembodiment of the inspection system 30c, the prism 91 associated witheach boundary segment imager 36 is a mirror prism having a silvered backadapted to communicate a boundary segment image at approximately a 90°angle toward the objective 92. In other words, the angle φ between theincident light and objective axis is about 90°. Further, the camera 64is preferably a CCD, for example but not limited to, a Hitachi modelKP-M1 CCD.

The feature imager 38 of the inspection system 30c includes an objective95 positioned along an axis aligned longitudinally with the termination21 in order to capture an image of the feature of interest and pass thefeature image to the camera 64, for example but not limited to, aHitachi model KP-M1 CCD. Furthermore, the imaging system 32 is movedrelative to the termination 21 for focusing purposes via a FAM 39.

The FAM 39 is adapted to move the entire imaging system 32, includingthe prism(s) 91, objective(s) 92, objective 95, and cameras 64 so thatthe optical arrangement is maintained, while the focus of the systemrelative to the termination endface 21' is changed. Thus, all elementsof the feature imager 38 and the boundary segment imager 36 are part ofa common metrology frame that is moved by the FAM 39 with respect to thetermination endface 21'. A suitable FAM 39 is a piezoelectrictranslator, for example but not limited to, a model P721.00piezoelectric translator manufactured by Physik Instrumente, Germany.

The machine vision system 34 can be any suitable logic, processor,computer, or combination thereof, as previously described, that cananalyze the images generated by the imaging system 32 and that cancontrol the focus of the imaging system 32 via control of the FAM 39. Inthe preferred embodiment, the machine vision system 34 combines theboundary segment images with the feature image to generate the combinedimage for eccentricity analysis.

F. Fourth Embodiment Of The Inspection System

A fourth embodiment of the automatic inspection system 30 of FIG. 2 isillustrated in FIG. 6 and generally denoted by reference numeral 30d.

In the inspection system 30d, each of the one or more boundary segmentimagers 36 and the feature imager 38 share hardware. Specifically, theimaging system 32 comprises an objective 101 centered about and along anz axis aligned with the termination 21 for receiving a feature image andthe one or more boundary segment images. In the preferred embodiment,the objective 101 has the largest NA possible for fields of view ofabout 2.7 mm and a magnification of about 10x.

A camera 64a is positioned to receive the feature image from theobjective 101, and one or more cameras 64b are positioned to receive acorresponding boundary segment image from the objective 101. In turn,each camera 64a, 64b converts its corresponding image into an electricalsignal that is passed to the machine vision system 34, as is indicatedby the reference arrow 45. The cameras 64a, 64b are essentially custommade CCD devices, each being basically the same size and each preferablyhaving a scan of 480×32 pixels.

The imaging system 32 is secured to a FAM 39, which is controlled by themachine vision system, as indicated by the reference arrow 78. The FAM39 moves the imaging system 32, including the objective 101 and cameras64a, 64b, along the z axis aligned with the termination 21 for focusingthe objective 101 on the termination endface 21'. A suitable FAM 39 is apiezoelectric translator, for example but not limited to, a modelP721.00 piezoelectric translator manufactured by Physik Instrumente,Germany.

The machine vision system 34 can be any suitable logic, processor,computer, or combination thereof, as previously described, that cananalyze the combined image generated by the imaging system 32 and thatcan control the focus of the imaging system 32 via control of the FAM39. In the inspection system 30d, the machine vision system 34 reads indata signals from all of the cameras 64a, 64b as if all of the cameras64a, 64b were a single CCD device to create a combined image of 480×480pixels. In other words, the output from each camera 64a, 64b representsa portion of the combined image.

III ALIGNMENT OF THE TERMINATION ENDFACE

In order to capture appropriate images for analysis by the machinevision system 34, the termination endface 21' should be appropriatelyaligned with the imaging system 32 of the corresponding inspectionsystem (FIGS. 2-6). The termination endface 21' can be aligned with theimaging system 32 using any of numerous possible mechanical mechanismsthat are known in the art. Several feasible embodiments for alignmentare described hereafter, as examples.

A. First Embodiment For Alignment

In a first embodiment for alignment, the termination endface 21' isaligned with the imaging system 32 using a V-shaped block. An example ofthe V-shaped block is illustrated and described in U.S. Pat. No.4,738,508 to Palmquist. The V-shaped block is disposed to align thetermination endface 21' along the x, y axes. Moreover, a rim may bedisposed at an end of the block or a protrusion may be disposed toextend outwardly from a support surface of the V-shaped block to serveas a stop for the termination endface 21', so as to align thetermination endface 21' along the z axis.

B. Second Embodiment For Alignment

In a second embodiment for alignment, the termination endface 21' isaligned with the imaging system 32 using an alignment body, such as acylindrical sleeve, having a cylindrical aperture for receiving andguiding the alignment surface 22"' of the termination 21. The aperturealigns the termination endface 21' along the x, y axes. Moreover, a rimmay be disposed at an end of the body or a protrusion may be disposed toextend outwardly from a surface defining the aperture to serve as a stopfor the termination endface 21', so as to align the termination endface21' along the z axis.

C. Third Embodiment For Alignment

A third embodiment for alignment of the termination endface 21' is thebest mode known at present for practicing the present invention. Itenables lighting of the termination endface 21' without the need forlaunching light through the fiber 24. Further, it is particularly suitedfor a ferrule termination 21, because it accommodates for the bevelledchamfer 22", i.e., for the situation where the boundary segment(s) andthe feature are in different focal planes. Moreover, the thirdembodiment is particularly suited for use with four boundary segmentimagers 36, although a lesser number can be utilized, as will beapparent from the discussion hereafter.

The third embodiment for alignment uses a novel alignment apparatus 110,as is illustrated in FIGS. 7A, 7B, and 7C. In structure, the alignmentapparatus 110 comprises a plurality of rigid alignment arms, preferablyfour alignment arms 111a-111d. From the front view in FIG. 7A, each ofthe alignment arms 111a-111d appears as a body spanning the area of aquarter circle. The alignment arms 111a-111d have distal ends 113a-113d,respectively, and mounted ends 114a-114d, respectively. As further shownin FIG. 7A, the alignment arms 111a-111d are spaced apart via spacings116, and each of the distal ends 113a-113b converges toward and definesa throughway, or aperture, 118. The aperture 118 has a diameter that islarger than the diameter of the fiber endface 24' and that is smallerthan the diameter of the plug endface 22' so that the plug endface 22'engages the distal ends 113a-113d of the respective alignment arms111a-111d, while the fiber endface 24' and a portion of the plug endface22' therearound is fully exposed. Thus, the distal ends 113a≧113d of thealignment arms 111a-111d position the termination endface 21' along thelongitudinal z axis of the termination 21 relative to the imaging system32.

In the preferred embodiment, the radius (typically, 18 mm nominal) ofcurvature of the distal ends 113a-113d of the alignment arms 111a-111dis generally the same as that for the plug endface 22' so that thedistal ends 113a-113d fnly engage the plug endface 22' in asurface-to-surface manner without damage (e.g., marring, indentation,etc.) to the plug endface 22'. The aforementioned construction isillustrated in FIG. 7B at reference numeral 126.

The alignment arms 111a-111d can be mounted in any suitable manner, butare preferably mounted to a rigid stationary plate 122 at their mountedends 114a-114d. The stationary plate 122 has a substantially circularorifice 124 with an appropriate diameter to permit passage of thetermination 21 therethrough so that the plug endface 22' can be engagedby the distal ends 113a-113d of the alignment arms 111a-111d. The centerof the plate orifice 124 is substantially aligned with the center of theaperture 118. In the preferred embodiment, the plate orifice 124measures about 2.5 mm in diameter and is positioned about 2 mm away fromthe inside surface of the arms 111 at the aperture 118.

In order to align the termination endface 21' along the x, y axesrelative to the imaging system 32, the rear surface of the stationaryplate 122 is equipped with an elongated cylindrical split sleeve 127having opposing sleeve halves 127a, 127b, as shown in FIG. 7C. Thesleeve 127 can be made from any rigid material and is secured to theplate 122 via any appropriate mechanism or bonding agent or is producedas an integral part of the plate 122. The plate orifice 124 is alignedwith the internal throughway defined by the sleeve 127 so that thetermination 21 can be inserted within the sleeve 127 and through theorifice 124 and the alignment surface 22"' is guided by the sleevehalves 127a, 127b and orifice 124 along the x, y axes.

As a result of the configuration of the alignment apparatus 110, whenthe termination 21 is engaged with the alignment apparatus 110, thefiber endface 24' is aligned in along the z axis by the arms 111 andalong the x, y axes by the sleeve 127, and furthermore, the fiberendface 24' (as well as a portion of the plug endface 22' therearoundand the core endface 28') and four boundary segments 125a-125d areentirely exposed to the imaging system 32 (FIG. 2).

IV. LIGHTING OF THE TERMINATION ENDFACE

In order to capture appropriate images for analysis by the machinevision system 34 (FIGS. 2-6), the termination endface 21' should besufficiently illuminated with light from a natural or artificial source.Several examples of possible lighting arrangements are describedhereafter.

A. First Embodiment For Lighting

A first embodiment for lighting is suitable for any type of termination21, including both the ferrule and biconic terminations 21. In the firstembodiment, light is launched through the optical fiber 24 toward thetermination endface 21' under test using any suitable light source. Thelight may be launched from another termination 21 of or other interfaceto the optical fiber cable having the termination endface 21' undertest. With this lighting configuration, the regions of the core endface28', the fiber endface 24', plug endface 22', alignment surface 22"',and background surrounding the alignment surface 22"' will exhibitvarying degrees of light intensity, and clear lines of demarkation existbetween the aforementioned regions. These clear lines of demarkationenable accurate determination of the eccentricity of the core endface28' relative to the alignment surface 22"'. Although the foregoinglighting configuration works well, it may sometimes be impractical tolaunch light along the fiber 24 toward the termination endface 21'.

B. Second Embodiment For Lighting

A second embodiment for lighting is suitable and practical for atermination 21 having a plug made from an opaque material or materialthat does not transmit an appreciable amount of light. Biconicterminations 21 typically have a plug made from epoxy or plastic, whichboth do not propagate light very well, and therefore, this lightingembodiment can be used effectively in connection with the biconictermination 21. However, this lighting embodiment is not desirable forthe ferrule termination 21, because a ferrule termination 21 typicallyhas a plug made from zirconia (Zr₂ O₃) or alumina (Al₂ O₃), which bothare highly reflective of light. The intensity of light reflected fromthe Zr₂ O₃ or Al₂ O₃ is often sufficient to saturate the camera CCDelement and reduce its ability to produce an image that allowsdiscrimination of the core boundary.

Generally, in the second embodiment for lighting, light is projecteddirectly at the termination endface 21' from any or all angles relativeto the longitudinal z axis of the termination 21. With this lightingconfiguration, the regions of the core endface 28', the alignmentsurface 22"', and background surrounding the alignment surface 22"' willexhibit varying degrees of light intensity, and clear lines ofdemarkation exist between the aforementioned regions. These clear linesof demarkation enable accurate determination of the eccentricity of thecore endface 28' relative to the alignment surface 22"'.

C. Third Embodiment For Lighting

A third embodiment for lighting of the termination endface 21' does notrequire the launching of light along the fiber 24 toward the endface 21'and is the best mode, known at present, for practicing the presentinvention. The third embodiment is particularly suited for the thirdembodiment for alignment, i.e., the alignment apparatus 110 of FIGS.7A-7C, when used in connection with a termination 21 having a plug madefrom a translucent material or material capable of some degree of lighttransmission. Ferrule terminations 21 typically have a plug made fromzirconia (Zr₂ O₃) or alumina (Al₂ O₃), which both can propagate light,and therefore, this lighting embodiment can be used effectively inconnection with the ferrule termination 21.

The third embodiment for lighting comprises a plurality of light sources128, for example but not limited to, fiber optic bundles, situated overthe alignment arms 11la-111d of the alignment apparatus 110 so thatlight passes through the spacings 116 and aperture 118 and impinges uponthe boundary segments 125a-125d and upon the plug endface 22', fiberendface 24', and core endface 28'. In the preferred embodiment, there isone light source situated over each spacing 116 and exposed at an anglea from an z axis passing through the termination endface 21. The angle αis preferably greater than about 70° because the acceptance angle of thefiber 24 is less than 5°. Because of the foregoing configuration, thefiber 24 absorbs virtually no light, and light impinging upon thetermination endface 21' from the light sources 128 is scatteredthroughout the plug 24 and cladding 27 of the fiber 24. The scatteringlight passes back out from the beveled chamfer 22" and the plug endface22', and the cladding 27 endface, but does not scatter from the coreendface 28'. A reason that light does not scatter out from the coreendface 28' is that the light propagation characteristics of the core 28are much different than those of the cladding 27 and the plug 22. Inother words, the core endface 28' appears much darker than thesurrounding cladding and plug. Furthermore, the stationary plate 122 isequipped with the plate orifice 124 having an appropriate size toprevent light from approaching the core 28 at a low enough angle toenter the core 28 and reflect back from a remote end toward thetermination endface 21' under test.

The combination of the novel alignment apparatus 110 and its associatedlight sources 128 has the following advantages. The fiber endface 24' isdirected to a predetermined position with respect to the inspectionsystem (FIGS. 2-6). The alignment apparatus 110 does not make anyphysical contact with the fiber endface 24'. The endface boundary of thealignment surface 22"' of the termination 21 does not have to be in thesame focal plane as the fiber endface 24' and simultaneous imaging canstill take place. Finally, the fiber core 24 does not have to beilluminated from another end of the termination 21 under test.

V. COMBINED IMAGES

The combined images that can be captured and generated by the imagingsystem 32 (FIGS. 2-6) of the inspection system (FIGS. 2-6) will now bedescribed. The combined images enable accurate computation of the offsetof the object feature relative to the boundary of the object, andparticularly, in the case of the termination 21, the eccentricity of thecore endface 24' relative to the alignment surface 22"', despite thefact that the alignment surface 22"' is much larger than the coreendface 24'. Indeed, the alignment surface 22"' typically measures about2500 microns in a ferrule termination 21, whereas the core endface 24'measures between about 8 and about 50 microns. Furthermore, it should benoted that the images described hereafter may be displayed on the outputdevice 46 (FIG. 2) by the machine vision system 34 (FIGS. 2-6), ifdesired, with additional overlay images, if desired.

FIG. 8 schematically shows the termination endface 21' with an overlayof the feature image 131 that is captured by the feature imager 38 (FIG.2). As shown, the feature image 131 is large enough to encompass thefiber endface 24' (both the core endface 28' and the cladding endface27') and a portion of the surrounding plug endface 22', but is notsufficiently large enough to capture the entire termination endface 21'and, particularly, the alignment surface 22"'. The one or more boundarysegments imagers 36 (FIG. 2) are configured to capture a respectiveboundary segment image 133a-133d that includes respective boundarysegments 125a-125d. In the case when more than one boundary segmentimager 36 is employed, the boundary segment imagers 36 should bepositioned to capture boundary segment images 133 that are spacedsymmetrically about the core endface 28'. In the preferred embodiments,four boundary segment imagers 36 are utilized, and they are configuredto capture the boundary segment images 133a-133d, as shown in FIG. 8.

FIGS. 9A-9D show various combined images 136a-136d, as nonlimitingexamples, to illustrate the variations in combined images that can beretrieved by the inspection system 30, depending upon the particularimplementation (systems 30a, 30a', 30c, 30d). Any of the images136a-136d can be utilized by the machine vision system 34 to determinethe offset, or eccentricity.

More specifically, FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate respective combined images136a, 136b having a single boundary segment image superimposed over afeature image. To generate the foregoing image, a single boundarysegment imager 36 (FIG. 2) and a feature imager 38 (FIG. 2) areutilized. FIG. 9A shows a combined image 136a derived from a core image131 and an inverted boundary segment image 25, whereas FIG. 9B shows acombined image 136b derived from a core image 131 and a noninvertedboundary segment image 25.

FIGS. 9C and 9D show combined images 136c, 136d with four boundarysegment images 25 superimposed over the feature image 131, in accordancewith the preferred embodiments. FIG. 9C shows the best mode of theinvention and shows a combined image 136c derived from a core image 131and four inverted boundary equally-spaced segment images 25a-25d. FIG.9D shows a combined image 136d derived from a core image 131 and fournoninverted equally-spaced boundary segment images 25a-25d. Asmentioned, utilization of more than one boundary segment image 25enhances the accuracy of the eccentricity calculation.

Finally, it should be noted that the inspection systems 30a, 30a' (FIGS.3A, 3B, respectively) are configured to capture and generate the images136a, 136c (FIGS. 6A, 6C, respectively), whereas the inspection systems30c, 30d (FIGS. 5, 6, respectively) capture and generate the images136b, 136d (FIGS. 6B, 6D, respectively).

VI. INSPECTION METHOD

A novel inspection method 140 for configuring and driving the machinevision system 34 (FIGS. 2-6) is set forth in FIGS. 10A through 10B. Inessence, the inspection method 140 causes the inspection system 30 tofocus the imagers 36, 38 on the object under test, analyzes the capturedcombined image 136, and determines the eccentricity based upon thelocation of the boundary segment(s) 125 relative to the core endface 28'within the combined image 136.

Initially, as indicated in the flow chart block 141, the terminationendface 21' is presented to the imaging system 32 (FIG. 2-6) of theinspection system 30. If a ferrule termination is to be tested, then thealignment apparatus 110 (FIGS. 7A, 7B) is preferably utilized to alignthe termination endface 21'. An input is also provided to the system 30by the user to indicate whether the termination endface 21' correspondsto an ideal termination 21 (i.e., a reference termination withsubstantially zero eccentricity) or a termination 21 to be tested.Obviously, the system 30 can be configured to assume a test termination,unless otherwise specified by the user. If an ideal termination endface21' is present, then the algorithm 140 will perform a calibrationroutine, as will be described hereinafter.

Next, a combined image 136 is acquired and stored by the machine visionsystem 34, as denoted in the flow chart blocks 142, 143, 144a. In orderto acquire the image with optimal focus, the FAM 39 is utilized to movethe imagers 36, 38 relative to the termination endface 21' byincrements, and after movement by each increment, the focus of thecombined image is checked via gradient analysis. The gradient is thechange, or difference in value, between a pixel value and the value ofan adjacent pixel along a particular direction. Preferably, the FAM 39is initialized so that the imagers 36, 38 are located the furthestdistance away from the termination endface 21', and then the imagers 36,38 are moved incrementally toward the termination endface 21', whilemonitoring gradient changes in the combined image 136.

After it is determined that the focus peak has been passed aftermovement by an increment, the FAM 39 is controlled to move the imagers36, 38 back to the optimal focus position, as is indicated in the flowchart blocks 143, 144b.

The core endface center C(x₀, y₀) (either C_(ideal) or C_(test)) of thecore endface 28' is calculated and the center x,y coordinates are saved,as denoted in flow chart block 145. The center C(x₀, y₀) is identifiedusing any appropriate analysis of the combined image 131, for example,gradient analysis. Furthermore, the coordinates x,y are based upon theimage boundary of the combined image 131.

As delineated in the flow chart block 146, a search area 135 (FIGS.9A-9D) is defined in the combined image 131 for each of the boundarysegments 125 that exist in the combined image 136. In the preferredembodiments, each search area 135 is a region having a circular side anda linear side and is disposed within the boundary of the fiber endface24'. One reason that each search area 135 is confined to a region withinthe outer boundary of the fiber endface 24' is that this placementminimizes possible adverse effects resulting from noise that will existaround the fiber boundary. Moreover, in the best mode, there are foursearch areas 135a-135d that are defined equidistant about the image ofthe core endface 28' for the purpose of searching for each of fourboundary segments 125a-125d, respectively.

Next, as indicated in the flow chart block 147, localized gradientsearches are performed via normal scans across each search area 135 inorder to identify the location of the boundary segment 125 within eachsearch area 135. More specifically, lines that are transverse to theboundary segment 125 are scanned and analyzed by examining the changinggradient between adjacent pixel values. From the foregoing analysis, thelocation of the boundary segment 125 can be identified in each searcharea 135.

In order to ensure the integrity of the determination of the boundarysegment location, the inspection method 140 ensures that the outerboundary segment(s) 125 are in optimal focus. In order to ensure optimalfocus, the gradient searches are performed iteratively after the PAM 39has been adjusted to move the imaging system 32 along the z axis, andafter each adjustment by the FAM 39, the gradients for each search area135 are summed and compared to a previous value in order to determine apeak value. Once a peak value has been identified by passing the peakvalue, the FAM 39 is caused to retract so that the optimal focus pointis achieved for the outer boundary segments 125. The foregoing processis indicated in flow chart blocks 148-151.

As indicated in the flow chart block 152, a curve (e.g., circle,ellipse, etc.) is fitted in two dimensions (in x, y plane) to eachboundary segment 125 by iteratively scanning through several fits andchoosing the one with the least squares error. In the preferredembodiment, a circle of a known diameter (in the best mode, 2.5 mm) isfitted to each boundary segment.

After a curve has been fitted to each boundary segment 125, adetermination is made as to whether the termination 21 is an idealtermination 21 or a test termination 21, as indicated in flow chartblock 154. The ideal termination 21 is used for calibration of theinspection system 30 and is basically a termination 21 with minimaleccentricity (as close to zero as possible), as determined by any othersuitable process, such as any of those indicated in the backgroundsection of this document. The presence of an ideal termination is inputto the machine vision system 34 by the user during initialization of theinspection system 30, as indicated at flow chart block 141 (FIG. 10A).

If an ideal termination 21 is present, then the inspection method 140performs a calibration method, as indicated in flow chart block 155 andthen transfers back to flow chart block 141 and remains ready foranalysis of a test termination 21, if desired. Alternatively, if at flowchart block 154 a test termination 21 is present, then the inspectionmethod 140 determines the eccentricity using an offset determinationmethod, in accordance with flow chart block 156, and then the method 140concludes. First and second embodiments for the calibration andeccentricity determination procedure are described hereafter.

A. First Embodiment For Calibration And Eccentricity Determination

The manner in which the eccentricity is determined depends upon themanner in which the inspection method 140 is calibrated. The firstembodiment for calibration and eccentricity determination will bedescribed with reference to FIGS. 11-13. In this regard, a calibrationmethod 155' is shown in FIG. 11, and a corresponding offsetdetermination method 156' is illustrated in FIG. 12. The secondembodiment for calibration and eccentricity determination will bedescribed with reference to FIGS. 14-16. In this regard, a calibrationmethod 155" is shown in FIG. 14, and an offset determination method 156"is illustrated in FIG. 15. It should be noted that the second embodimentfor calibration and eccentricity determination constitutes the best modeknown at present for practicing the present invention.

1. Calibration Method

The calibration method of the first embodiment is shown in FIG. 11 andis denoted by reference numeral 155'. With reference to FIG. 11, thecalibration method 155' establishes an ideal termination endface centerT_(ideal) (x₁, y₁) for the ideal termination 21, pursuant to flow chartblock 155a'. FIG. 13 graphically illustrates the ideal core endfacecenter C_(ideal) (x₀, y₀) (determined earlier as indicated in flow chartblock 145 of FIG. 10A) and the ideal termination endface centerT_(ideal) (x₁, y₁) as well as other graphical features that will bereferred to hereafter. The ideal termination endface center T_(ideal)(x₁, y₁) is determined as follows. If there is only one fitted curve(i.e., only one boundary segment image) from the previous step indicatedat flow chart block 152 (FIG. 10A), then the ideal termination endfacecenter T_(ideal) (x₁, y₁) is the center of the single fitted curve. Incontrast, if there is more than one fitted curve, then the center foreach fitted curve is determined, and the ideal termination endfacecenter T_(ideal) (x₁, y₁) of the ideal termination endface 21' isdetermined by any suitable mathematical average of fitted curve centers.Next, as denoted in flow chart block 155b' of FIG. 12 and as furthershown in FIG. 13, the ideal core endface center C_(ideal) (x₀, y₀),which was determined earlier as indicated in flow chart block 145 ofFIG. 10A, is retrieved, and a distance vector d_(ideal) (vectors are inbold text herein) between the ideal core endface center C_(ideal) (x₀,y₀) and the ideal termination endface center T_(ideal) (x₁, y₁) iscomputed. The distance vector d_(ideal) is saved as an ideal referencefor use in future eccentricity analysis of other test terminations 21,as indicated in flow chart block 155c'. Finally, the inspection method140 transfers back to flow chart block 141 and remains ready foranalysis of a test termination 21, if desired.

2. Offset Determination Method

The offset determination method of the first embodiment is set forth indetail in FIG. 12 and is denoted by reference numeral 156'. Atermination endface center T_(test) (x₁ ', y₁ ') is initiallyestablished for the termination endface 21 under test, pursuant to flowchart block 156a' of FIG. 12 and as illustrated in FIG. 13. If there isonly one fitted curve, then the termination endface center T_(test) (x₁', y₁ ') is the center of the fitted curve. In contrast, if there aremore than one fitted curves, then the center for each fitted curve isdetermined, and the termination endface center T_(test) (x₁ ', y₁ ')center of the test termination 21 is determined by any suitablemathematical average of fitted curve centers. Note that in the case of asingle fitted curve for locating the termination endface center T_(test)(x₁ ', y₁ '), the boundary points should be fitted exactly to theboundary image to allow for possible diameter variation of thetermination boundary. This restriction does not apply to the best modebecause in the best mode curves are fitted to multiple boundarysegments, and this feature enables averaging out any possibletermination diameter variations.

Next, as indicated in flow chart block 156b' of FIG. 12 and as furthershown in FIG. 13, the actual core endface center C_(test) (x₀ ', x₀ ')is retrieved, and a distance vector d_(test) between the core endfacecenter C_(test) (x₀ ', y₀ ') and the termination endface center T_(test)(x₁ ', y₁ ') is computed. Furthermore, as denoted in flow chart block156c', the eccentricity vector e is determined by computing the absolutevalue of the difference between the distance vector d_(test) and theideal reference distance vector d_(ideal), or e=|d_(test) -d_(ideal) |.The eccentricity is then determined from the eccentricity vector e asthe magnitude thereof. If the magnitude is determined in terms ofpixels, then it can be converted, if desired, from pixels to an absolutedistance (e.g., microns). It should be noted that the distance vectorsd_(ideal), d_(test) can be represented in or converted to terms ofabsolute linear distances (e.g., microns) prior to the eccentricityvector determination so that the eccentricity vector determinationdirectly yields a magnitude in terms of absolute distance.

The angle of the eccentricity vector e is also of relevance in that itrepresents the spatial relationship of the pixels C_(test) (x₀ ', y₀ ')and C_(ideal) (x₀ ', y₀ ') and can be identified from the distancevectors and displayed on the output device 46 (FIG. 2), if desired.

B. Second Embodiment For Calibration And Eccentricitv Determination

The second embodiment for calibration and eccentricity determination isnow described with reference to FIGS. 14-16. Specifically, a calibrationmethod 155" is shown in FIG. 14, and a corresponding offsetdetermination method 156" is illustrate in FIG. 15. The secondembodiment for calibration and eccentricity determination constitutesthe best mode known at present for practicing the present invention.Unlike the first embodiment, the second embodiment accounts for andcorrects nonlinearities in the imaging system 32 (FIG. 2), resultingfrom the fact that the combined image 136 contains information collectedfrom separate optical imagers 36, 38, and thus optimally relates theposition of the boundary segments 125 to the core endface 28'.

To practice the second embodiment, the imaging system 32 should have twoor more boundary segment imagers 36, but preferably an even number tosimplify the mathematics. For purposes of simplicity in this discussion,the second embodiment will be described hereafter with reference to fourboundary segment imagers 36 and an orthogonal Cartesian coordinatesystem x, y, z, which constitutes the preferred embodiment.

1. Calibration Method

The calibration procedure of the second embodiment is shown in FIG. 14and is denoted by reference numeral 155". Initially, at this point inthe inspection method 140, an ideal termination 21 is exposed to theimaging system 32 and is in focus (fixed with respect to the alignmentapparatus 110 along z axis).

As delineated in the flow chart block 155a", a transformation map iscreated from the ideal termination 21 and stored for future reference.The transformation map is essentially a device for comparing thecharacteristics of an ideal termination 21 to another termination 21 tobe tested. Structurally, the transformation map can be a lookup table ora mathematical equation implemented by the inspection method 140. Tocreate the transformation map, a series of measurements is performedwith the inspection system 30 in which the termination 21 issequentially moved to a multiplicity of x, y locations in the field ofview of the imaging system 32 with an adjustment mechanism, and datapertaining to each boundary segment 125 and core endface 28' is storedfor each location.

Any appropriate adjustment mechanism (not shown) can be employed formoving either the alignment apparatus or the imaging system 32 so thatthe termination endface 21' can be systematically moved by the user inan x, y plane to cause the core endface 28' to appear anywhere in apredefined image area in the x, y plane. For example, the adjustmentmechanism could simply be a mounting bracket that permits manualmovement of the alignment apparatus 110 or the imaging system 32 by theuser. In the preferred embodiment, the adjustment mechanism is employedin connection with the alignment apparatus 110, and the alignmentapparatus 110 can be moved along the x, y axes, while the terminationendface 21' remains in focus along the z axis.

As set forth in flow chart blocks 155b"-155f", the transformation map isderived as follows. As indicated in flow chart block 155b", the idealtermination 21 is moved to a location in the x, y plane with theadjustment mechanism. The ideal core endface center C_(ideal) (x₀, y₀)is identified via any suitable gradient search analysis, pursuant toflow chart block 155c". After identifying the ideal core endface centerC_(ideal) (x₀, y₀), radial lines are drawn outwardly from the centerC_(ideal) (x₀, y₀), one radial line corresponding with each boundarysegment 125, in accordance with flow chart block 155d". The radial linesare preferably spaced symmetrically about the C_(ideal) (x₀, y₀).Moreover, as indicated in the flow chart block 155e", the center of thefitted curve corresponding to each boundary segment 125 is positioned invirtual space on the corresponding radial line. Further, the pixelpositions where the radial lines intercept the fitted curves areidentified, as indicated in the flow chart block 155f", and theseintercept positions are stored as well as the core position of the coreendface 28' are stored for the particular termination location. A newlocation is selected, and the aforementioned procedure is repeated untila sufficiently complete transformation map has been constructed.

Creation of the transformation map in connection with the preferredembodiment occurs as follows. As graphically illustrated in FIG. 16, inthe preferred embodiment where there are four boundary segments125a-125d that are spaced symmetrically about the C_(ideal) (x₀, y₀),radial lines 157a-157d are defined in the image 131. In fact,preferably, a single vertical line (comprising radial lines 157b, 157d)and a single horizontal line (comprising radial lines 157a, 157c) aredefined so that they are perpendicular to each other and so that theirintersection is positioned on the ideal core endface center C_(ideal)(x₀, y₀). Then, the centers of the fitted curves corresponding to thefour boundary segments 125 are positioned in virtual space so that theyreside on one of the lines. Thus, the centers of curves correspondingwith boundary segments 125b, 125d are positioned on the vertical line157, and the centers of curves corresponding with boundary segments125a, 125c are positioned on the horizontal line 158. Next, theintercept values x₁ ', x₃ ', y₁ ', and y₃ ', where the respective radiallines 157c, 157a, 157d, 157b intersect the respective boundary segmentcurves 125c, 125a, 125d, 125b, are identified. Finally, the interceptvalues x₁ ', X₃ ', y₁ ', and y₃ ' as well as the core location of thecore endface 28' are stored for the particular termination location. Anew location is selected, and the aforementioned procedure is repeateduntil a sufficiently complete transformation map has been constructed.

Once the optical system has been characterized in this manner by thetransformation map, the ideal termination 21 is moved with theadjustment mechanism so that its core endface 28' appears near thecenter of the image space. For example, if the image space is 480×512pixels, then the ideal core endface center C_(ideal) (x₀, y₀) ispositioned at the 240th pixel along the y axis and at the 256th pixelalong the x axis. Then, the adjustment mechanism is stabilized and fixedat this location for future operation of the inspection system 30 sothat the alignment apparatus 110 and the imaging system 32 are fixedalong the x, y axes, in accordance with the flow chart block 155g".

2. Offset Determination Method

The offset determination method in accordance with the second embodimentis set forth in detail in FIG. 3 and is denoted by reference numeral156". The method 156" will be described with reference to the graphconstructed by phantom lines in FIG. 16. In general, with the method156", a test termination 21 of unknown eccentricity is measured usingthe transformation map that was constructed using the calibration method155" and the ideal termination 21.

The core endface center C_(test) (x₀ ', y₀ ') is identified via anysuitable gradient search analysis, pursuant to flow chart block 156a"and as graphically shown in FIG. 16. After identifying the ideal coreendface center C_(test) (x₀ ', y₀ '), radial lines are drawn outwardlyfrom the center C_(test) (x₀ ', y₀ '), one radial line correspondingwith each boundary segment 125, in accordance with flow chart block156b". The radial lines are preferably spaced symmetrically about theC_(test) (x₀ ', y₀ '). Moreover, as indicated in the flow chart block156c", the center of the fitted curve corresponding to each boundarysegment 125 is positioned in virtual space on the corresponding radialline. Further, the pixel positions where the radial lines intercept thefitted curves are identified, as indicated in the flow chart block156d". The intercept positions are indicated as (x₁ ',y₂ '), (x₂ ', y₁'), (x₃ ', y₂ '), and x₂ ', y₃ ') in FIG. 16. However, preferably, onlythe coordinates x₁ ', X₃ ', y₁ ', and y₃ ' are identified, as these aresufficient to compute the eccentricity.

Next, in accordance with the flow chart block 156e", the eccentricity iscomputed. First, the quantities ε_(x) and ε_(y) are calculated from theformulas listed below: ##EQU1## at the y₂ level ##EQU2## at the x₂ levelwhere x₁ ', x₃ ', y₁ ', and y₃ ' are the positions of the intercepts ofa zero eccentricity termination 21 whose core endface 28' is measured ata point coincident with the current location of the core endface 28' ofthe test termination 21. Furthermore, the eccentricity is determined bythe following equation: ##EQU3##

The eccentricity calculated in the second embodiment is much moreaccurate than that computed in the first embodiment because the secondembodiment corrects for nonlinearities in the imaging system 32 (FIG. 2)and optimally relates the position of the boundary segments 125 to thecore endface 28'.

VII. BALANCED FOCUS METHOD

A balanced focus method 160 is illustrated in FIGS. 7A-7C. The balancedfocus method 160 is applicable to an inspection system 30 (FIG. 2) thatemploys more than one boundary segment imager 36 and is implemented inthe best mode of the invention. Essentially, the balanced focus method160 is an optimization technique for increasing the accuracy of thecomputation and location of the boundary segments 125 (FIG. 8, 9A-9D).

Generally, locating the position of multiple segments 125 using themachine vision system 134 (FIG. 2) is most accurate when the segments125 are in sharp focus, i.e., the gradient between the segment 125 andthe background is maximized. Small differences in the optical focallength of the several boundary segment imagers 36 can exist. Thesedifferences in general mean that portions of the object under test willachieve maximal gradient at different extensions of the FAM 39. Thebalanced focus method 160 overcomes the foregoing problem.

The balanced focus method 160 is implemented by the machine visionsystem 34 (FIG. 2-6) during the step in the inspection method 140 (FIGS.10A-10B) denoted in flow chart block 147 (FIG. 10A). As describedpreviously, in the step indicated at the flow chart block 147, localizedgradient searches are performed in order to identify each boundarysegment 125.

Pursuant to the balanced focus method 160, as denoted in the flow chartblock 161 of FIG. 17A, the FAM 39 is initially adjusted so that thefocus of any of the boundary segment imagers 36 is before the focusplane of any of the boundary segments 125.

Next, a search area 135 is defined for each boundary segment 125 basedupon the actual location of the core endface 28', as indicated in theflow chart block 162. The search areas are preferably spacedsymmetrically about the core endface 28'.

Pursuant to the flow chart block 163, a series of combined images 136are generated and stored by moving the imaging system 32 incrementallyalong a z axis aligned with the longitudinal axis of the termination 21.During the acquisition of the images 136, the optimal focus point foreach search area 135 as well as the cumulative optimal focus point forthe imaging system 32 are passed. After retrieving each combined image136, gradient searches are performed in each search area 135 to identifythe pixel exhibiting the maximum gradient for each scan line.

With respect to the gradient searches in each search area 135, pixelshaving a maximum gradient in a scan line are saved, provided that theymeet a minimum threshold, as delineated in the flow chart block 164. Inthe preferred embodiment, the minimum threshold T_(min) =P_(min) +0.3(P_(max) -P_(min)), where P_(max) is the grey scale value (0-255) of thelightest pixel and where P_(min) is the grey scale value of the darkestpixel. The P_(max) and P_(min) can be determined using any suitableprocess, for example, a histogram. Furthermore, the number of pixelsthat have a maximum gradient in a scan line and that meet the minimumthreshold are summed for each search area 135. In the preferredembodiment, there are four search areas 135, and hence, four sums a, b,c, d, of pixels result from the foregoing process.

In accordance with the flow chart block 165, a search is performedthrough each of the sums to identify an optimal focus position for theimaging system 32 along the z axis, as dictated by the FAM 39, for eachindividual search area 135. The optimal focus position corresponds tothe position where the highest number of acceptable pixels (meetingthreshold requirements) for the particular search area 135 is achieved.

Next, as indicated in the flow chart block 166, a statistic S iscomputed by summing the absolute value of the differences betweenpairings of all combinations of the pixel sums for each search area. Inthe preferred embodiment, there are four segments 125 and four pixelsums a, b, c, d, and thus, the statisticS=|a-b|+|a-c|+a-d|+|b-c|+|b-d|+|c-d|.

The statistic S exhibits the graph as shown in FIG. 18. In accordancewith the flow chart block 167, the statistic S is analyzed and the focusposition f₀ where the slope of the statistic S is at a minimum isidentified. Next, a determination is made as to whether each search area135 contains enough pixels when the slope of the statistic S isminimized. This ensures a reliable fit. Moreover, the threshold is anarbitrary number, preferably based upon empirical data.

If the answer to the foregoing inquiry is in the negative, then thebalanced focus method 160 deviates from the statistic S by a minimum FAMincrement toward the maximum cumulative number of pixels, in accordancewith the flow chart block 168. A determination is made as to whether amaximum deviation has been reached based upon the number of FAMincrements moved, as indicated in the flow chart block 169. If themaximum deviation has not been reached, then the method 160 returns tothe step indicator in the flow chart block 167 to determine whetherthere are enough gradient points. In the event that the maximumdeviation has been reached, then the method 160 terminates, and anappropriate message can be forwarded via the output device 46 (FIG. 2)to the user, such as "No solution for this sample. Clean sample andretry the measurements." The foregoing is indicated in the flow chartblock 171.

When it is determined that there are enough gradient points based uponthe statistic S, as inquired in the flow chart block 167, the method 160then moves the FAM 39 to the z coordinate of the optimal minimumstatistic S, as delineated in the flow chart block 172.

After the FAM 39 has been moved to the z coordinate, the optimal image136 is acquired, as indicated in the flow chart block 173, for furtheranalysis in accordance with the further steps of the inspection method140 (FIGS. 10A-10B).

It will be obvious to those skilled in the art that many modificationsand variations may be made to the embodiments as described withoutsubstantially departing from the spirit and scope of the presentinvention. It is intended that all such modifications and variations beincluded herein within the scope of the present invention, as is setforth in the appended claims.

Wherefore, the following is claimed:
 1. An offset determination methodfor determining an offset of a central feature of an object, comprisingthe steps of:capturing a feature image of said feature and a pluralityof boundary segment images of respective boundary segments of saidobject; combining said feature image and said boundary segment images toproduce a combined image; locating a feature center of said featurewithin said combined image; locating said boundary segments in saidcombined image; fitting a curves to each of said boundary segments;identifying curve centers of said curves; defining radial linesoutwardly from said feature center; positioning each said curve centerupon a corresponding one of said radial lines; determining interceptlocations between said radial lines and said curves; and determiningsaid offset by comparing said intercept locations to predefinedintercept locations.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said object is anoptical fiber termination endface, said feature is an optical fibercore, and said offset is an eccentricity of said core relative to saidsurrounding support material.
 3. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising the step of defining said radial lines symmetrically aboutthe feature center.
 4. The method of claim 3, further comprising thestep of defining said radial lines orthogonally about said featurecenter.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step ofcreating a transformation map that includes a plurality of sets of saidpredefined intercept locations, each of said sets corresponding to alocation of said feature center.
 6. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising the step of acquiring said intercept locations based upon amathematical equation and said feature center.
 7. The method of claim 1,further comprising the step of acquiring said intercept locations basedupon a lookup table and said feature center.
 8. The method of claim 1,further comprising the step of projecting said feature image and saidboundary segment image onto a single charge coupled device in order tocombine said feature image and said boundary segment image and to formsaid combined image.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising thestep of utilizing curves of predefined diameter when fitting saidcurves.
 10. An offset determination system for determining an offset ofa central feature of an object, comprising:(a) an imaging systemincluding a feature imager and a plurality of boundary segment imagers,said imaging system to be exposed to said object, said feature imagerconfigured to capture a feature image of said central feature, saidboundary segment imagers configured to capture a respective boundarysegment image of a respective boundary segment of said object, saidimaging system configured to create a combined image from said featureimage and said boundary segment image; (b) a machine vision systeminterfaced with said imaging system and configured to determine saidoffset based upon said feature image and said boundary segment image;and (c) offset determination means having:(1) means for locating afeature center of said feature within said combined image; (2) means forlocating said boundary segments in said combined image; (3) means forfitting a curves to each of said boundary segments; (4) means foridentifying curve centers of said curves; (5) means for defining radiallines outwardly from said feature center; (6) means for positioning eachsaid curve center upon a corresponding one of said radial lines; (7)means for determining intercept locations between said radial lines andsaid curves; and (8) means for determining said offset by comparing saidintercept locations to predefined intercept locations.
 11. The system ofclaim 10, wherein said object is an optical fiber termination endface,said feature is an optical fiber core, and said offset is aneccentricity of said core relative to said surrounding support material.12. The system of claim 10, wherein said means of paragraph (c)(5) isconfigured to define said radial lines symmetrically about the featurecenter.
 13. The system of claim 10, wherein said offset determinationmeans comprises a transformation map that includes a plurality of setsof said predefined intercept locations, each of said sets correspondingto a location of said feature center.
 14. The system of claim 10,wherein said offset determination means comprises a mathematicalequation for acquiring said intercept locations based upon a featurecenter.
 15. The system of claim 10, wherein said imaging systemcomprises a single charge coupled device to combine said feature imageand said boundary segment image to form said combined image.
 16. Acomputer-readable storage medium having a computer program fordetermining from an image a termination endface an eccentricity of anoptical fiber core of an optical fiber relative to the termination atthe termination endface, the computer program comprising:means forlocating a core endface center and a plurality of boundary segments ofsaid termination endface in said image; means for fitting a curves toeach of said boundary segments; means for identifying curve centers ofsaid curves; means for defining radial lines outwardly from said coreendface center; means for positioning each said curve center upon acorresponding one of said radial lines; means for determining interceptlocations between said radial lines and said curves; and means fordetermining said offset by comparing said intercept locations topredefined intercept locations.